Stories Short Story Short Trips (Big Finish) Story: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 The Juror’s Story 1 image Overview Characters How to Read Reviews 2 Statistics Quotes Overview Released Thursday, August 26, 2004 Written by Eddie Robson Pages 14 Time Travel Present Location (Potential Spoilers!) Earth, England, London Synopsis The Juror's Story was the tenth short story in the Short Trips anthology Short Trips: Repercussions. It was written by Eddie Robson. It featured the First, Second, Third, Fifth and Eighth Doctors. Read Read Favourite Favourited Add Review Edit Review Log a repeat Skip Skipped Unowned Owned Owned Save to my list Saved Edit date completed Custom Date Release Date Archive (no date) Save Characters First Doctor Second Doctor Third Doctor Fifth Doctor Eighth Doctor Show All Characters (5) How to read The Juror’s Story: Books Doctor Who Short Trips: Repercussions Reviews Add Review Edit Review Sort: Date (Newest First) Date (Oldest First) Likes (High-Low) Likes (Low-High) Rating (High-Low) Rating (Low-High) Word count (High-Low) Word count (Low-High) Username (A-Z) Username (Z-A) Spoilers First Spoilers Last 2 reviews 23 December 2024 · 141 words Review by hallieday Spoilers This review contains spoilers! The First Doctor #27 'The Juror's Story' (2004) from Short Trips: Repercussion. Despite being unfamiliar with both 12 Angry Men and the four respective Doctors here who are not the First, I still got plenty out of this little story and enjoyed my time with it. As I was attempting to figure out which Doctor was which I actually had the realisation that I do not know the voice of any classic Doctors aside from One and Four. I even thought that Dr Bowman here was the Fourth and heard him in that way the whole time before realising he was the Eighth on the wiki. It'll be fun to see how stories such as this change in my mind years from now once I am further accustomed to the future Doctors, but it was perfectly satisfactory as a tale by itself for now. hallieday View profile Like Liked 0 28 May 2024 · 147 words Review by Rock_Angel 1 I really struggle with court room dramas and this court room drama is a huge struggle, especially in a short story form. I couldn't tell you any of the characters names apart from the Doctors but even then i couldn't tell you which doctor was which. I had to look up who Dr. Smith was and they where the 5th Doctor didn't read like that at all. All the other Doctors give there bits to defend one and persuade the other jury members slowly gaining in numbers of course, all the Doctors end up voting not guilty of course. The story ends with Dr Bowmen and Harris talking and saying the problem with time travel is time lines get so over written. i found the story extremely dull, its just not for me unfortunately I really just couldn't find the groove with this then it was gone. Rock_Angel View profile Like Liked 1 Open in new window Statistics AVG. Rating7 members 3.15 / 5 Member Statistics Read 14 Favourited 0 Reviewed 2 Saved 1 Skipped 0 Owned 1 Quotes Add Quote Submit a Quote